Consider William Blakes presentation of love in the poem The Clod and the Pebble Essay

(b) paid close attention to language and form, write a critical gustatory perception of the following verse, considering William Blakes presentation of retire in the poem The testicle and the Pebble.The Clod and the PebbleLove seeketh not itself-importance to please,Nor for itself hath any c ar,solely for an early(a) gives its ease,And builds a Heaven in sines despair.So sung a little Clod of Clay 5Trodden with the cattles feet,But a Pebble of the brookWarbled out these metres meetLove seeketh exactly self to please,To bind other to its delight, 10Joys in anothers dismissal of ease,And builds a Hell in Heavens despite.The ostensible prettiness of the poem The Clod and the Pebble perhaps masks a to a greater extent morbid and deep cynical assessment of dear by the poet William Blake. Initially, the contrast between the puffiness and the pebbles speeches on love might encourage a verificatory response to the landsmans optimism just about how love can bringing us from ev en the most blessed position. The pebbles pessimism about love, on the other hand, is unpleasant and unsettling, but its also a to a greater extent accurate reflection of the brutal nature of the world as it is picture in the poem. Blakes presentation of love, then, is ambivalent. While the ideal that love is qualified to overcome any circumstance is appealing, it might not be a realistic assessment in the context of the worlds cruelty.Blakes personification of the punk and the pebble captures both real different human aims. We are told that the thump is trodden with the cattles feet. With the word trodden Blake captures the puzzle of relentless hardship, and being repeatedly downtrodden, subjugated and abused. There is also tactile imagery of encumbrance and pressure from the cattles feet, restricting the clod and forcing it into a impertinently shape. In this way, the clod is described as though it experiences human suffering. It makes us think about someone who has h ad to become flexible to fit the continual hardship of their circumstances reflected in the physical properties of a patrician clod of clay. It is then pleasantly surprising that the clod sings about love in the most optimistic way.On the one hand, the clods optimism concerning love is deep admirable, and the parallel structure used to present this speech on board the pebbles emphasises that optimism in the most appealing way. The clod states that love builds a Heaven in Hells despair, go the pebble states that it builds a Hell in Heavens despite. The clod speaks from the context of a hellish existence that entails pain and suffering, and endows love with the cleverness to transcend such an experience and create a heavenly existence of joy and happiness. The pebble, on the other hand, speaks from a comparatively heavenly existence and instead endows love with the capacity to corrupt that existence with the pain and suffering suggested by the word Hell. Our view that the clod i s admirably optimistic ten evolves into a feeling that we alike want and even believe that love will rescue and brook solace to this figure.Conversely, the parallel structure also helps to emphasise the pebbles pessimism. The clod declares that love seeketh not itself, while the pebble answers that love seeketh only self. The phrases not itself and only self create a clear juxtaposition here of the two views of love. The first underscores it as essentially selfless, while the other underscores it as dead and solely selfish. Moreover, while the clod sings happily about how love for another gives its ease the pebble responds with how love joys in anothers loss of ease. The clods words suggest an action of willing self-sacrifice, while the pebbles words suggest a selfish acquisition that leaves another diminished. Of course, the pebbles view means that there is no hope for the clod and that love in fact provides no Heaven.Furthemore, the pebbles assessment of love is deeply cynical and ugly. It is, however, true to both its own experience and that of the clod. The clod is trodden upon while the pebble is of the brook. We imagine a gentle and tranquil existence within the soft current of a stream. Traditionally, however, rivers also symbolise a journey from honour to worldliness. The water represents the experience that flows over us during life, leaving us more aware. This experience has left the pebble implacable. We imagine someone who has become hardened from experience and this is reflected in the physical properties of the pebble. Now the water is forced to bend nigh the pebble, just as the clod must bend around the feet of the cattle. This is a depiction of the worlds harshness and cruelty, and we cannot help but measure that it is the pebbles assessment of love that more accurately reflects it.To conclude, perhaps the poem is as much about idealism and realism as it is about love. Love, after all, is subject to our tendency to be both idealistic and realistic. in the long run though, it seems that the depiction of the world as harsh and brutal confirms a nix view of love as equally harsh and brutal. At the very least, the poem encourages us to be ambivalent of love and not ponder it to be a kind of saviour capable of transcending all.