Assess the Reasons for the February Revolution Essay Example for Free

Assess the Reasons for the February Revolution EssayHe was also Anti-semitic, a quality which is why he did nothing rough attacks by the black hundreds or the like, and this is also why many Jews joined the revolutionary parties. Nicholas also appointed many bad ministers, who actually worsened the situation, preferably than keeping the better ministers such as Stolypin and Witte, who had aimed to reform Russia, instead dismissing them. He refused to grant political reforms such as those demanded in the 1905 revolution. His brasss trouble to politically reform also led to problems. They promised reforms that werent carried out, didnt pass reforms that could drop been extremely helpful to Russias situation. They also didnt accept ideas such as liberal freedoms, and Stolypins own reforms soon proved to be too little, too late. Nicholas Failure to reform due to his conservatism, as well as his governments failure, proved to be its downfall. Lack of reform left the works septe s in poor conditions, which let Socialism grow rapidly, with the kernel tier becoming Critical of the Tsar and his system.The Government didnt deal with the peasantry and the land hunger, and Stolypins reforms did not aid the situation in the end. They increasingly used retrenchment as War grew closer, causing more and more discontented. As well as this, if Nicholas II hadnt been the way he was, there wouldnt have been the revolutionary parties that pushed for change. The First World War is a highly serious factor, and Russias entry into it was due to its foreign policy, and it ties to France due to loans. There were three eld of very little success, which demoralised the people.The army was highly inefficient and unorganised, with massive casualties in battles. The war caused a great strain on the economy, which affected the working class and the peasantry, in that the peasantry were pushed to produce food which was hard to produce in the harsh conditions of Russia, and the w orking class were pushed hard to produce weaponry in the factories. And this caused discontent among the many classes of Russia. There was also a strain on social cohesion, with people beginning to grow more discontent on the whole, and with less unity.As well as this the incompetence of the government was revealed, which was shown to all the people of Russia now that it couldnt be hidden. To add to this, the government began to increase its use of suppression, forcing Russian purification on Minorities, persecuting Jews, using reactionary actions to deal with protest, and continuing with the oppressive Okhrana. The government also showed its lack of understanding on how to deal with protest, as it most lots simply reverted to suppression rather than negotiation, which just led to more discontent and riots.Industrialisation is another important factor, as well as the working class. The childbed was growing, with poor conditions and overcrowding, combined with the lack of reforms by the government. Socialism was becoming huge in working class circles, and they began to move for change. There were many working class strikes, especially during the February revolution. The higher industrial demand of the war as well as the growing industry put strains on the peasantry, with high taxes, which caused mass discontent.The peasantry as well as the land hunger in Russia was also a factor of fair importance. The Peasants wanted the land that belonged to the gentry, and Stolypins reforms hadnt resolved this, as peasants began taking land for their own. As well as this, the peasants that were conscripted into the army became disappoint and would eventually join the others in the February revolution against the Tsar and his regime. There was also a lack of food, and the failure to supply sufficient amounts of grain led to urban unrest.The Middle class opposition towards the government began to grow in the lead up to this period. There was a growth in Political debate, d espite Autocracys ongoing reign, as well as a growing middle class involvement in the Zemstva and a general belief in the need to widen the basis of the regime. There began a development of Professions, and the Intelligentsia that had been educated in the Universities began to see what was going wrong. As well as this, Education was becoming more widespread, so more and more people were becoming disillusioned about the government and its actions.The lower classes began seeing what was wrong with the country and its government, and began wanting change. Alexandra and Rasputin were a strong influence on Nicholas II, and she reinforced his belief in autocracy. As well as this, Alexandras German origins led to fake rumours of her treason against Russia, which although fake, still sowed discontent among the people, especially in Petrograd. Rasputin gained influence over the Royal Family, ahead(p) to people being unsure who was really in power.Nicholas was influenced by both of these pe ople, and this means they too contributed to Russias problems. The Revolutionary parties only really took control by and by the revolution, but they still had their part to play in it, albeit a more passive part. Their propaganda undermined loyalty to the Regime, and they reduced the quality of the Bureaucracy by drawing apart the able young ministers. The Government grew afraid of them, and tried to use increasing amounts of suppression to try and control them, which just increased discontent.Overall, Nicholas II is the most important factor in the outbreak of the Revolution. If he had not been there, the other factors would probably not have existed. He caused the discontent and protest simply because of the failure of his government to reform, rather they chose to uphold Autocracy and not give any power to the people of Russia. The least important factor is the Revolutionary parties, as although they played a more active and important part in the aftermath of the Revolution, th ey were mostly passive in the largely spontaneous February revolution.