Communication Patterns of Men and Women :: essays research papers fc

The whole god curse business of what youre occupation knowledge bugs the hell out of me. I never know what you women smashed when you talk about it. Karen complains that I dont talk to her, nevertheless its not talk she wants, its some other damn thing, only I dont know what the hell it is This adduce from a man interviewed by Lillian Rubin is the perfect example of the differences in communication between men and women. These differences in communication methods of women and men are innate(p) of a complex interaction between society and the individual. Men face to skin with intimacy and emotional expression, spot women rely on this graphic symbol of communication causing much struggle between the sexes.Lillian Rubin suggests that intimacy, a hammer of communication between men and women, itself is an ambiguous or difficult name to define, but asserts that it does embody the idea of the ability to put away a public persona and be cared about or care for the genuine pers on. This alludes to a struggle between the homophile need for intimacy and that for independence suggested by other sociologists. In addition to this idea of intimacy, Rubin looks deeper into the human psyche and analyzes the different ways in which men and women communicate their emotions. Rubin explains that man women can easily explain what emotions they are feeling and what has caused these, men struggle to verbalize their feelings and this causes animosities between men and women. Women want men to communicate their emotions epoch men dont understand why they should or how to go about doing this (Rubin, p. 384-386). Rubins explanation for the differences in communication is that it stems from societal pressures that assist men to suppress their emotions, and act rationally. Men are socialise to believe that acting emotionally like women is not normal. She states that this is the single about dispiriting dilemma between women and men. Finally Rubin goes on to suggest that while men can act out anger and frustration in spite of appearance the family, the expression of fear, dependency, or sadness would expose vulnerability, and is difficult for men to do (Rubin p. 383-388). Another Sociologist, Deborah Tannon, has done research in the differences between communication methods of women and men. She in like manner suggests that conflicting ideas of intimacy and independence plays a critical role in the differing views of communication.